⚠ Simulator outputs are scenario-based projections, not forecasts. All results depend on model assumptions. View assumptions · Reproducibility policy
Provenance:Dataset:TEIAS v2025.1Model:TIMES v1.0Run:5 Nov 2026
sig_a417acfad709SeededInterpretation Guardrail
These results are scenario-based projections, not forecasts. They reflect model assumptions about technology costs, policy choices, and demand trajectories. Actual outcomes will differ. Always consult the full methodology and assumption registry before drawing policy conclusions.
Scenario Metrics
| Metric | This Scenario | Baseline |
|---|---|---|
| Total System Cost | 437.1 bn TL | 532.4 bn TL |
| Cost Reduction vs Baseline | −11.3% | 0% |
| CO₂ Reduction | −28.8 Mtpa | 0 Mtpa |
| Renewable Share (actual) | 48% | 45.61% |
| Avg. Electricity Price | 263 TL/MWh | 253 TL/MWh |
| Peak Reserve Margin | 44.6% | 40% |
| Jobs Created | +92k | — |
| Storage Utilization | 41% | 39% |
Feasibility
✅Feasible — Score: 100/100
Input Parameters
Renewable Share 2035
48%
Solar Capacity
28 GW
Wind Capacity
26 GW
Carbon Price
150 TL/tCO₂
Coal Phase-out
2042
Demand Growth
low
Efficiency Boost
5%
Grid Flexibility
moderate
Battery Storage
10 GWh
Nuclear
Disabled