⚠ Simulator outputs are scenario-based projections, not forecasts. All results depend on model assumptions. View assumptions · Reproducibility policy
Provenance:Dataset:TEIAS v2025.1Model:TIMES v1.0Run:5 Nov 2026
sig_a417acfad709SeededInterpretation Guardrail
These results are scenario-based projections, not forecasts. They reflect model assumptions about technology costs, policy choices, and demand trajectories. Actual outcomes will differ. Always consult the full methodology and assumption registry before drawing policy conclusions.
Scenario Metrics
| Metric | This Scenario | Baseline |
|---|---|---|
| Total System Cost | 540.3 bn TL | 532.4 bn TL |
| Cost Reduction vs Baseline | −6.8% | 0% |
| CO₂ Reduction | −20.9 Mtpa | 0 Mtpa |
| Renewable Share (actual) | 38% | 45.61% |
| Avg. Electricity Price | 257 TL/MWh | 253 TL/MWh |
| Peak Reserve Margin | 46.1% | 40% |
| Jobs Created | +68k | — |
| Storage Utilization | 32% | 39% |
Feasibility
✅Feasible — Score: 100/100
Input Parameters
Renewable Share 2035
38%
Solar Capacity
18 GW
Wind Capacity
22 GW
Carbon Price
0 TL/tCO₂
Coal Phase-out
2045
Demand Growth
baseline
Efficiency Boost
0%
Grid Flexibility
rigid
Battery Storage
5 GWh
Nuclear
Disabled